Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tereza Martincova vs Paula Badosa Gibert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martincova vs Gibert analysis and find out who is favored!
Tereza Martincova vs Paula Badosa Gibert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martincova 3 - 1 Gibert
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martincova has won 44.39% of points on their second serve, while Gibert has won 47.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martincova, in recent form, has won 55.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gibert has won 55.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.78% and 33.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martincova has saved 53.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibert has saved 65.2% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martincova has won 50.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 26), with Gibert winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martincova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 97/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 49% (W/L 28/ 29). Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Martincova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Martincova winning 3 times and Gibert being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Martincova winning 6 and Gibert winning 2. The last match between Martincova and Gibert was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 12-03-2022, Second, Hard with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martincova and Gibert have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martincova winning 0 times and Gibert 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Martincova winning 1, and Gibert 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martincova has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.26 while Gibert has played against players with an average rank of 203.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martincova has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibert has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martincova has converted 44.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibert has converted 44.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
195
Rank
40
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
118
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (433-346)
Career Total W/L
64% (347-196)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
50% (11-11)
$1,063,669
Career Prize Money
$5,050,999
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tereza Martincova vs Paula Badosa Gibert For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Martincova VS Gibert
Sportsbook
Offer
Martincova VS Gibert H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tereza Martincova | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 45 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:24 | 1:26:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (183/245) | 63% (173/273) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (123/183) | 66% (115/173) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (30/62) | 38% (38/100) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (13/31) | 36% (8/22) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (120/273) | 38% (92/245) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Martincova VS Gibert H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tereza Martincova | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 50% (11/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (33/34) | 52% (28/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (313/327) | 50% (254/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:45 | 1:46:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.45 | 217.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (1615/2194) | 59% (1021/1716) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (948/1615) | 65% (666/1021) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (257/579) | 47% (328/695) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (107/243) | 45% (81/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (909/2075) | 42% (684/1623) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (14/29) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 56% (9/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 44% (9/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 46% (13/6) |
Tereza Martincova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Varvara Gracheva
80%
(
66 of
82)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Tereza Martincova
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Tereza Martincova
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
74%
(
88 of
119)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
51 of
88)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Tereza Martincova
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Tereza Martincova
52%
(
12 of
23)
1st Serve %
68%
(
13 of
19)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
31
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Laura Pigossi
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Mara Guth
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Tereza Martincova
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Tereza Martincova
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
78%
(
100 of
129)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
129)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Martincova Vs Gibert Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Martincova are available here and Gibert photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
